This is absolutely heroic. Truth is a hard thing to stop.
US Army medical doctor LTC Theresa Long blows the whistle on the risks associated with Covid-19 injections in the US military. Her compelling affidavit in support of an injunction order on Covid-19 vaccine use in the military is definitely worth reading. It reminds me that life, in general, requires a constant application of cost-benefit analysis, and this analysis can only be properly assessed from the perspective of the individual facing the risks and benefits in question.
Why would the US military want to mandate an experimental therapy on its soldiers when only 0.00143% of military members have perished from Covid-19? Why subject your forces to an mRNA gene therapy that will very likely have long-term consequences?
LTC Long stresses,
18. Literature has demonstrated that natural immunity is durable, completed, and superior to vaccination immunity to SARs-CoV-2. mRNA vaccines produced by Pfizer and Moderna both have been linked to myocarditis, especially in young males between 16-24 years old,2 The majority of young new Army aviators are in their early twenties. We know there is a risk of myocarditis with each mRNA vaccination. We additionally now know that vaccination does not necessarily prevent infection or transmission of SARs-CoV-2Therefore individuals fully vaccinated with mRNA vaccines have at least two independent risk factors for myocarditis after vaccination. Additional boaster shots add more risk. It is impossible to perform a risk benefit analysis on the use of mRNA as counter measures to SARs-CoV-2 without further data… Use of mRNA vaccines in our fighting force, presents a risk of undetermined magnitude, in a population in which less than 20 active-duty personnel out of 1.4 million, died of the underlying SARs-CoV-2.
Read the rest of her heroic affidavit here: